Vancouver police shooting captured on video by teen

CBC News Posted: Nov 24, 2014 4:28

to protect and serve

A teenager riding in a tow truck with his dad and the driver recorded video during a fatal police shooting at an East Vancouver intersection on Saturday, shortly before 5 p.m. PT.

In the video, recorded by 13-year-old Noah Jamieson, the interaction between the man and the police officers at the northeast corner of Knight Street and 41st Avenue is partly obscured by a white van stopped in a southbound lane.

But an officer is seen holding a weapon that recoils twice, as the sound of two shots is heard.

“What was that?” says one of the men in the truck.

“Sounds like gunshots,” the other says.

“Yeah, that’s what I thought,” the first replied.

Once the white van moves out of the way, the video shows a man lying on the ground, with two officers attending to him.

The man was taken to hospital, but died of his injuries.

Man was shouting, waving piece of lumber

The Vancouver police said the man, identified by the B.C. Coroners Service as 51-year-old Phuong Na Du, or Tony Du, was distraught and waving a two-by-four at the intersection before officers arrived.

Kieran Fogarty, a witness to the incident, said there were up to eight people waiting with him at a nearby bus stop when Du, carrying the piece of lumber, walked by them and headed to the street corner.

“He was talking to himself, talking to the traffic, and he was rubbing the stick across the fence and tapping the fence with the stick,” he said.

Fogarty said he was initially amused, texting his friend about it, but then the situation soon escalated.

“A police car pulled up and police started asking the man to come, and to come towards them across the crosswalk and to put down the stick, and right when they say put down the stick they opened fire on him,” Fogarty said.

“He was halfway through the crosswalk when he finally stopped, the one shot hit him, and he bent down on two knees and they came over and they handcuffed him, and other police cars showed up.”

‘Within a minute’

Police said Du had refused to comply with officers’ directions and that bean-bag rounds were first used to attempt to disarm him.

“Eventually the man was shot,” Const. Brian Montague said in a statement Saturday night.

Fogarty told CBC News that he estimates the entire interaction took place “within a minute.”

Camia Weaver, a justice consultant and former lawyer who has worked with the Canadian Mental Health Association, said the timing raises questions about why the officers reacted as they did.

“It happened so fast, and that means to me that the time wasn’t taken to approach the situation in a way that would have had a better outcome,” she told CBC News.

The Independent Investigations Office has opened a file and said it is grateful that a number of witnesses have come forward with statements and with video of the incident.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vancouver-police-shooting-captured-on-video-by-teen-1.2848561

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Vancouver police shooting captured on video by teen

  1. Chris Rutka says:

    When there is suspicion that violence or assault may have been comitted by a “civilian”, the suspect is immediately separated from any associates; isolated, and then questioned. It is this timely statement, made either at the scene or within 24 hrs if detained, that will be analysed against reports of witnesses, and against any evidence found or collected over time.

    However – when the police are suspect, they are NOT immediately separated, isolated, and interrogated. Many days may pass before they are required to give their version of events, and during this period they remain apprised of the evidence as it is obtained. As they learn what events were witnessed they also discover what was NOT observed, what facts have remained undiscovered.

    This is the period when the police ask for witnesses – they need to know what information they will have to respond to, and what events appear to have gone undected; what evidence was missed, was unobtainable, or deemed inconclusive.

    Because of collaboration, plausable responses can be developed to the challenges they know will be made. A story can be concocted that does not contradict the evidence which will be presented, but can make full and creative use of the the areas they know have remained unknown or unobserved.

    The police can easily furnish, over time, an agreed history of events that will have them appear not culpable. In any case, as we learned after the execution of the notorious airport stapler, they can always later refuse to answer questions put to them in an inquiry, be “unable to recall” crucial events, and may even succeed in perjury!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s